8-18-2007

Overview

John Shore's book, I'm OK--You're Not, teaches that since most Americans have heard about Christianity, the Lord's command for us to share the gospel with people is now in direct opposition to his command for us to love people. He teaches that in order to resolve this incompatibility we must now stop sharing the gospel, and instead simply love people.

What specifically makes this heretical? Any teacher, who for any reason, comes along and begins to teach the church to stop doing something Christ commanded, is teaching heresy.

Suggesting that Christ would give us two commandments that at some future point in history would begin to be in opposition to each other, puts the Lord on a level of ineptitude bordering on the imbicilic. And one immediately wonders how on earth anyone who claims to be a Christian could suggest such a thing. But as the book is read, the reason John has come to this conclusion becomes glaringly obvious... John believes that Christianity is a sort of a self-help, support-group type of loving "club," where people seek to change "the essense of who they" are into something better.

Imagine for a moment that he was right.

What in the world would be "loving" about us telling someone "my club is better than your club... and since I'm a member of my club that means I'm a better person than you... you need to change the essence of who you are and join my club... and in fact, if you don't join my club you're going to Hell"?

Do you see anything loving in there? No. Nothing. In fact, that would be about the most arrogant, and idiotic thing anyone could ever say.

Since this is John's perspective of what Christianity is, it is easy to see why he thinks that the "Great Commission" to go and make disciples is incompatible with God's commandment for us to love our neighbor. This makes me very worried for John personally. I actually pray that John would go to www.WayoftheMasterRADIO.com and click on the message there entitled “Are You Really a Christian?” which will reveal that this concept of what Christianity is -- the concept he apparently holds -- is hideously flawed.

If John had written a book that said something along the lines of, "Christians have got to stop being rude when they evangelize, and they've also got to start incorporating a lot more practical signs of love into encounters with unbelievers," that would be one thing. And someone who just flips through this book might assume that is it's message. However, as you will see below in the documentation, this is not what John is saying.

John stated on a recent www.WayoftheMasterRADIO.com interview that he has been a Christian for only ten years, and he clearly states in his book that he is not theologically trained. Perhaps the most disturbing thing about this whole situation is that the Navigators would allow a self-proclaimed "simple lay-person" to teach their readers something that is in direct opposition to Biblical truth and over 2000 years of Christian history.

Within John's book, there are three main problem areas:


The Nature of Love

John appears to interpret the biblical directive to love God as a command to sort of close one’s eyes, and experience a “majestic” and “phenomenal” feeling of having one’s “heart, soul and mind filled with the reality” of God’s love. 

We’re supposed to love God—which opens up our hearts so that we can feel how much God loves us—and then we’re supposed to love our neighbor…

…Let’s try it. C’mon: Let’s have ourselves a mini-Love Fest, right now. Take a moment, and with all the power in your heart and mind, love God. I’ll do it too.

Okay, I’m back.

Phenomenal.

…And when we have loved God with all of our heart, soul, and mind (and I think it’s worth noting that this is the order in which Jesus put those three), and been rewarded a zillionfold by having our heart, soul, and mind filled with the reality of God’s ineffable love, how do we then find ourselves feeling about the world and everyone in it?

Accepting!

We accept! We’re . . . okay with everything, and everyone, exactly as they are.

…We feel, to our bones, the majestic peace of divine acceptance.

From up on the mountaintop, all people look the same, don’t they?

p. 49-50

The idea that love is a feeling is a very dangerous one, but even more disturbing is that John tells us that if one is correctly experiencing this “feeling” of “love,” it will result in the feeling of being “accepting.” And that when we truly experience this we should be “okay with everything, and everyone, exactly as they are.”

This, of course, is in direct conflict with the Bible. Jesus was certainly not ever “okay with everything, and everyone, exactly as they are.” He spoke harshly to the Pharisees about their sin, he drove the money changers out of the temple… His incredible goodness and purity caused him to “Hate what is evil.” And that is what we are also instructed to do (Rom 12:9a).

Is God the Father “okay with everything, and everyone, exactly as they are”? Obviously not, since he created Hell as a place of punishment for those who break his Holy laws. No, God is not okay with murderers, rapists, abortion doctors… he’s not even okay with a little sexual fantasy and a few little-white-lies.

Now, don't get the wrong impression. God is incredibly merciful to those who repent and turn in faith to Jesus’ sacrifice as payment for their sin. And in that sense he is accepting! That is the incredible richness of his love… that Jesus would die in order to be able to accept sinners who don’t deserve his kindness. But even Jesus said to the woman caught in adultery, “Go and sin no more.” He was willing to accept her because of his great mercy, but he was not “accepting” in the sense that he was “okay with everything, and everyone, exactly as they are.” He told her to stop her sinning… she was not “okay” exactly as she was.

There is only one that I know of who is “okay with everything, and everyone, exactly as they are,” and that is Satan, the deceiver. I feel so heart-broken for John, the writer of this book. He seems so sincere… but he is badly, badly deceived. And even worse, he is putting himself at great risk before God on Judgment Day because he is elevating himself to the role of “teacher” and he is teaching a deception.

If we want a definition of what it means to love God with all our heart, soul, mind and strength… we will see that it is not a "feeling" at all. And the best person to give it to us would be Jesus himself:

If you love me, you will obey what I command. (John 14:15)

Whoever has my commands and obeys them, he is the one who loves me. He who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I too will love him and show myself to him. (John 14:21)

Jesus replied, "If anyone loves me, he will obey my teaching. My Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him. (John 14:23)

He who does not love me will not obey my teaching. These words you hear are not my own; they belong to the Father who sent me. (John 14:24)

If you obey my commands, you will remain in my love, just as I have obeyed my Father's commands and remain in his love. (John 15:10)

 


What it Means to be a Christian

John believes that Christianity is a sort of a self-help, support-group type of loving "club," where people seek to change "the essense of who they" are into something better. Notice the bold instances indicating that he believes becoming a Christian is when one “changes” or becomes a “better” person.

So, as far as I can tell, the two Big Messages of our Lord, taken together, amount to, “Love everyone, Christian or not—but if they’re not Christian, do what you can to change that.”

In other words, love non-Christians—but desire that they change.

Um.

If someone said to you, “I love you—but I want you to change the very essence of who you are,” would you feel all warm and fuzzy inside, or . . . not exactly. (p. 12)


The problem with our in any way communicating to a nonbeliever that they really should be a Christian is that, no matter how we put it, what we’re really saying is that they need to change. (p. 35)


 When we try to convert a Normie, (this is John’s softened term for an unbeliever) we’re telling that person what they should actually be… …Can we really blame Normies for sometimes ducking the other way when they see us coming? You tell a person that they need to changeespecially that they need to change the very essence of who they are—and the harsh fact of the matter is that you just called them a loser. (p. 36)

At one point, John tells about an encounter he had at his church a few weeks after “I converted.” He reports that a “fellow believer” he was being introduced to expressed joy at hearing of his conversion. The man then said:

So, has your whole life turned to [expletive deleted, because you can’t in any way curse in a book intended for a Christian audience] yet? (p. 24)

John relates just how refreshingly honest he felt that conversation was, and goes on to say:

And after we’d shaken hands again and agreed to have lunch together sometime, I thought: “So. That’s how Christians who don’t even know each other relate to each other!”

Bounding down the stairs away from the church, I thought: “Sweet! Bring me more Christians!”

It felt so great, belonging to a club in which everyone shared the same profoundly important beliefs—and were so often so refreshingly open about what those beliefs really meant to them. (p. 25)

Apparently this is how John understands the term “conversion,” or “becoming a Christian.” He expresses that it takes place when one realizes they need to change the very essence of who they are, and results in a brotherhood type bond similar to belonging to a club where everyone shares profound beliefs.

Since this appears to be John’s honest understanding of Christianity, it is no wonder he has written such a heretical book.

If Christianity was merely a self-improvement, self-help, type of loving, family “club.” Then it would indeed be insulting and quite rude to wave it around in someone else’s face saying it was better than their club. (How arrogant to say the Moose Lodge is better than the Elk Club!) If you look at all of John’s statements in this book through that lens… they all make perfect sense.

Back before I was a Christian, whenever I had a conversation with a Christian I was always just waiting for the moment they’d start trying to convert me. And that moment inevitably arrived. Sometimes the attempt was subtle (“So do you go to any kind of church or anything?”); sometimes it was overt (“So, have you heard the word of the Lord?”); sometimes it was just plain scary (“So, do you know you need to repent of your sins and accept Jesus as your personal savior if you don’t want to spend all of eternity burning in hell?”). But always, it arrived.

Not particularly good for the Great Commission—and not doing a lot for the Great Commandment, either. It’s not good for the Great Commission because it simply doesn’t work: A person on the receiving end of the message that in order to become a better (or at least “okay”) person they need to under go a radical transformation is generally inspired to do nothing so much as hightail it away from the messenger. And it’s not good for the Great Commandment, either, since once an evangelist and his or her would-be Christian have split up, their relationship is finished—and unless Hallmark company has come up with some truly amazing new card I haven’t yet heard about, it’s just not possible to love someone with whom you have no relationship at all. (p. 15-16)

Again in this section we see John referring to becoming a Christian as becoming a "better" person. He also says that it's “not particularly good” to reveal to people that they will be sentenced to Hell without Christ. His reason is stated, “because it simply doesn’t work.”

Pragmatism—doing what works (or what appears to “work”)—is the noose that the modern-day church is slowly choking to death on. John also says:

“…what’s critical for us to remember about the act of process of evangelizing is that it’s an endeavor that first and foremost must be results oriented.” (p. 41)

 “Implicit in the directive to evangelize, however, is to produce quantifiable results…” (p. 41-42)

 So, what does John think the church should be doing, instead of talking to people about Christ?

“Instead of ‘You need to become a Christian,’ I think a serious case can be made for the idea that the message we should be sending our nonbelieving friends and associates is, ‘We have free donuts!’” (p. 45)

“Because offering free donuts would be a gesture of uncomplicated, we-expect-nothing-in-return affection.” (p. 46)

As John does attempt to be light-hearted and funny throughout his book, this can be taken as a mild joke... but the premise behind it is not meant as a joke at all. Simply stated, Christians need to stop actively evangelizing and instead just be nice.

... it’s just not possible to love someone with whom you have no relationship at all. (p. 16)

I want to take just a moment to look a little more closely at the last part of the statement we started this section with. I would hope it's unnecessary to point out that this statement is absolutely ridiculous. It is very, very possible to love someone you have no relationship with. I’m certainly not advocating the destruction of relationships, but in many situations, a relationship must be sacrificed because of love.

Consider the mother and father with a drug addicted child who finally gets arrested. The child screams through the bars, “Get me out of here or I’ll hate you forever!” The parents weep as they turn to go… realizing that jail time may be the only thing to sober their child up. Only great love, or “tough love” as it is sometimes called, is willing to sacrifice itself, or even a relationship, for the ultimate good of the one they love.

The love of Christ, expressing itself through warning someone of God’s coming wrath is something like yelling, “Quick! Get into shelter! A tornado is coming!”

We say to people, “Quick, shelter in the blood of Christ which paid for your crimes against God! The great and terrible Day of God’s Judgment is coming!”

There is nothing more loving than that… and nothing more grievously evil than silently watching someone back over a cliff… avoiding telling them, because you don’t want to risk your relationship.


The "Great Commission"

John teaches that Christ's command to go and make disciples (often referred to as "the Great Commission") only really applied to the first century church. Today, he says, the "Great Commission" has been fulfilled (at least in the U.S.). The only people who should be evangelizing today are foreign missionaries. This is because there are only two kinds of people in America: those who are Christians, and those who have decided they don't want to be Christians.

John further teaches that if a Christian continues to try to obey Christ's command to make disciples, then he is then in direct conflict with Christ's command that we love our neighbor as our self. This is because telling people that they are under God's judgment will make them feel bad, and might damage our relationship with that person... thus it is unloving.

Yay! Pretty much every last, single person in America has heard the word of God! The Great Commission has gone a very long way toward being completely fulfilled right here in our own backyard!

Whoo-hoo!
We rock!
Well done, good and faithful servants!

So. Now what?

Well, the contention of this book is that now it’s safe to assume that all of our neighbors already know the story of Christ and the Bible and so on, it might be a good time to take some of that enormous energy we currently spend on converting those same people, and to focus it instead on “just” loving them as much as we love ourselves.

p. 14

 The Bible does tell believers to evangelize; there’s no question about that. But even if we disregard the fact that in America we can stop acting like it’s AD 55 because in effect most every American already knows about Christ…

p. 41

John’s most grave error, and the thing that actually makes this book heretical, is that of presuming to announce that the Great Commission has been fulfilled (at least here in the US), and therefore Christians need no longer obey Jesus’ command to go and make disciples.

What a horrible place John stands in. He has set himself up in the place of a teacher and now is instructing his readers to disobey Christ.

In essence he says, “Yes, I know that Jesus said to go and make disciples, but you can stop doing that… I’ve decided the Great Commission has now been fulfilled.”

Jesus defines love for him as obedience to his commandments (John 14:15-24). Breaking Christ’s commandments is sin. Anyone who encourages others to break one of Jesus’ commands is in a horrifying place before God.

“But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.” (Matthew 18:6)

 “Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:19)

John says that there are basically only two kinds of people left in the USA, “those who are already Christian, and those who have already decided that they don’t want to be Christian.”

The practical fact is that if we go out to evangelize in Anytown, USA, we’re pretty much guaranteed to run into one of two kinds of (grown-up) people: those who are already Christian, and those who have already decided that they don’t want to be Christian.

p. 31

Completely absent from John’s understanding are those who think they are Christians, but have not been born again—the False Converts that Jesus talks about in Matthew 7:21-23:

“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’”